“Does it matter if an interaction occurs face to face? Why? What suppositions do you bring to bear in thinking about this question?”
The importance of face-to-face interaction is an increasingly popular topic in the new generation. The use of Internet, telephones, and other technology has started to put face-to-face interaction on the back burner. The use of conference calls, chat rooms, and videoconference has allowed convenience and effectiveness in many aspects of people’s lives. So what do we get from face-to-face interaction? Why do we need face-to-face interaction?
Richard Rushton’s "What Can a Face Do?" explores this question, and discusses the meaning of facial expressions and their representations. Rushton states, “the face represents or expresses the inner feelings of a person; it expresses something that is hidden behind the face, yet there is something in the appearance of a face (on the face) that allows access to what is hidden beneath” (p. 219). I agree with Rushton’s statement; there is more to a conversation than just the words spoken. Body language and facial expressions are useful for getting points across and help leave a better understand of what is being said. Misinterpretation is very common among online communication, and even on the phone.

3 comments:
Interesting post. You seem to be saying that the face has some kind of authority, that it offers security, perhaps a security that text on screen doesn't offer. Does this mean that the face is an element of a kind of authoritarianism? Why?
I do not necessarily mean that face is an authority, but instead a tool for added meaning. The face and the presence offers more than words on a screen. Your face does not automatically give your words power, but can add power to your words. The use of body language and facial expressions can play a major role in getting through to your audience.
You are right to say 'can play a major role.' No argument there. But do texts lack authority if there isn't a face to back them up? And if so, why? Also, given the power of radio in the 20th century, shouldn't we consider other aspects of presence besides the face? With radio, there is no body language. But still there is power. Why? and how does this differ from text? Ong has some interesting ways of approaching these questions.
Post a Comment